Future Documentation Plans

GitBook has proven excellent in some ways but has frustrating limitations that make it unsuitable as a long-term solution for SA5's docs.
Rapid updates via a web-based docs editor
Redirects tracking as docs are re-organized
Custom domain
Attributes copy structure
Template options & styling control
Poor to none

Alternatives we're Exploring

  1. 1.
    • Pros: Open-source, supports versioned documentation, integrates well with React, and offers a rich set of plugins.
    • Cons: Requires some familiarity with React for advanced customizations.
  2. 2.
    • Pros: Open-source, written in Python, and has a wide range of plugins. It's lightweight and easy to set up.
    • Cons: Might require familiarity with Python for some customizations.
  3. 3.
    • Pros: Highly extensible, open-source, and written in Python. It's especially popular for technical and software documentation.
    • Cons: Has a steeper learning curve compared to some other options.
  4. 4.
    • Pros: Built on Vue.js, it offers a great balance between writing content and using Vue components. It's also optimized for performance.
    • Cons: Requires knowledge of Vue.js for advanced customizations.
  5. 5.
    • Pros: Widely used static site generator, integrates seamlessly with GitHub Pages, and has a large community.
    • Cons: Written in Ruby, which might not be familiar to everyone.
  6. 6.
    • Pros: Extremely fast static site generator written in Go. It has a rich ecosystem and can handle large sites with ease.
    • Cons: Templating can be complex for beginners.
  7. 7.
    Read the Docs:
    • Pros: Hosted solution that integrates well with GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab. It's especially popular for open-source projects.
    • Cons: More suited for technical documentation.
Last modified 5mo ago